Peer Review blogs
Cambridge: Sugar Rush:
1.
A couple cool elements I liked of the “Sugar
Rush” was the establishing shot of the Everglades and the logos of the companies
which produced and/or distributed the film.
2.
What I found odd was adding a bright background with
the title of the film as it completely sets off the tone and mood in which the
film had developed.
3.
This film (opening scene) did well in letting
the audience know that it was an opening scene but not to what would happen
next in the plot.
4.
When the characters were getting interviewed, they
were discussing about the “candy man” which gave clues about the plot, but they
also mention about not having something in Florida but rather in California which
was most likely said to mimic a resident living in Florida (specifically the
Everglades) but still has or seems to have no connection to the rest of what
has been said, confusing me with what the story Is about.
5. I would suggest the producers of the film opening to not let the establishing shot to go on for too long.
Monday – AICE Media Studies Film:
1.
The arc camera movement and the voiceover are great
elements which help the consumers to depict what the rest of the film might be
about.
2.
When a screen popped up with a question it made
the video seem more of a trailer than an opening scene.
3.
The majority of the film looked like a movie
opener until the viewers would get to the part with the question on the screen;
although, it did make the consumers want to know more about the plot of the
story.
4.
At first I believed the film was about a melancholy
romance as it displayed lowkey and high-key lighting, along with the music
being slow. It was towards the end of the film that I understood what the story
was possibly about, that being how two people switched bodies.
5. A couple suggestions I have for this movie opener is use the inside voice (what the person is thinking) when showing the other persons action as it’ll hint to the viewers that the souls were swapped into different bodies.
Sunday:
1.
The sound effects for when the protagonist got
knocked out and the single long point of view shot were a great choice of
elements used to clearly display the situation of a person freaking out
meanwhile someone else is chasing them/harming them.
2.
The film does use lowkey lighting to exaggerate
the gravity of the problem, but it seems to be too low for the viewers to make
out what’s going on for certain parts of the movie opener.
3.
The clip does seem to portray itself as a movie
opener since it shows the title of the movie, by who it’s from, and how a white
screen shows up (after the protagonist got knocked out) to leave the viewers
off on a cliffhanger.
4.
This movie opener is pretty straight forward
with what it shows; there was nothing confusing and only leaves the viewers wondering
what will come next.
5. The film was alright all throughout, but I would personally suggest to add a little more lighting so that it’ll be more visible to the audience.
Up the Score:
1.
The establishing shot of a school building, ground
level shots taken when a character was dribbling the ball, and the close-ups of
the faces of the characters are all film elements which were used well to
develop the opening scenes.
2.
Nothing in this film seems to need any necessary
improvements or suggestions to make the film opening better.
3.
Because of the beginning credits and the cliff
hanger at the end, along with the phrase “15 years later” the viewers can
comprehend that this clip is only the beginning of a film and the audience does
not know what will come next other than the story having to do something with a
soccer player.
4.
There wasn’t much in the movie opener to be confused
about since, the clip only showed a struggling match for a certain player.
5.
I would suggest displaying captions or raise up
the volume for when there’s dialogue as it gets a little challenging to completely
hear what the actors are saying.
Late Arrivals:
1.
The Dutch angle used when introducing the
antagonist and the fade-in and fade-out shots were well implemented to add an uneasy
feeling as if something ominous is looming just ahead and a feeling of being in
a hurry.
2.
A ground level shot was used for the majority of
the movie opener and though it does do well with following the characters in the
film through the hallways, a regular mid shot (meanwhile tracking) or long shot
would’ve been just fine as all the characters were already revealed before,
defeating the purpose of the ground level shot.
3.
The clip looked like a movie opener as it
displayed at the very beginning who participated in the film and how it reveals
the title of the movie towards the end.
4.
What left me a bit confused was if the antagonist
was in the same hallway or not as the protagonists were running out of the
school.
5.
Instead of using a ground level shot when the students
were running out of the school, a tracking camera movement at a mid-shot level could
have heightened the feeling of rushing out of the school.
Comments
Post a Comment